Games & Performance
Optimize Your Game Settings: The Ones That Cost the Most FPS
Not all graphics settings cost the same FPS, learn which ones to lower first for big frame gains and which to keep for the best-looking image.
Games & Performance
Not all graphics settings cost the same FPS, learn which ones to lower first for big frame gains and which to keep for the best-looking image.
The single biggest mistake I see people make when their frame rate tanks is dropping everything to Low and calling it a day. That leaves a lot of image quality on the table for very little gain, because a handful of settings are responsible for most of the cost while the rest are nearly free. Here is how I actually tune a game, in the order I do it, and why.
Whenever I sit down with a new game, I don't touch individual sliders first. I set the overall preset to High (not Ultra), then benchmark a demanding scene. Ultra presets almost always include one or two absurdly expensive settings that exist purely for screenshots, and High gets you 90 percent of the look for a fraction of the frame cost.
From that baseline I only raise or lower things I can actually see. The whole philosophy here is spend your frames where your eyes are, not where a preset decided for you. A good test scene is important too: pick somewhere with a lot going on, like a dense city street, a forest with foliage, or a big open vista with fog. A quiet indoor room will lie to you about your real performance.
If I had to name the setting that most often eats the most FPS across the widest range of games, it's shadow quality. Shadows are expensive because the engine effectively renders the scene an extra time from each light's point of view to figure out what's occluded, and higher settings crank up the resolution and draw distance of those shadow maps.
Here's the thing though: the jump from Ultra to High shadows is often invisible in motion. You'd need to stop, pause, and pixel-peep a specific shadow edge to notice the softening. So this is almost always my first cut.
My rule: I live on High shadows, drop to Medium if I'm still short on frames, and only go Low as a last resort before I'd rather lower the resolution instead.
Volumetric lighting, those god rays streaming through windows and the thick atmospheric fog that fills a valley, is one of the most frame-hungry effects in modern games and one of the most inconsistent. In some titles it's a rounding error. In others, especially ones built around moody atmosphere, it can cost you 15 to 25 percent of your frame rate at the highest setting.
Because the cost varies so wildly, this is a setting I always test individually. Toggle it between High and Low while watching your frame counter in a foggy scene. If the number barely moves, leave it high and enjoy the atmosphere. If it craters, drop it a notch. Medium volumetrics usually keep the vibe while shedding most of the cost.
Anti-aliasing smooths the jagged staircase edges on geometry, and how much it costs depends enormously on which method you use, not just how high you set it.
Modern temporal upscalers double as anti-aliasing, and they're usually your best deal. DLSS, FSR, and XeSS in their Quality modes render the game at a lower internal resolution and reconstruct it, which means you get cleaned-up edges and a frame rate boost at the same time. On a lot of my builds this is the first thing I turn on, before I start cutting anything, because it gives back frames instead of taking image quality.
If you're chasing frames, never run MSAA. Use an upscaler's Quality mode, or a light TAA, and move on.
Ambient occlusion adds the soft contact shadows in corners, under objects, and where surfaces meet, the subtle grounding that makes a scene feel three-dimensional instead of flat. The mid settings are cheap and worth keeping. The trap is the fancy ray-traced or high-sample variants (HBAO+, GTAO on Ultra) which can carry a real cost for a look most people never consciously notice. Medium AO is the sweet spot: you get the grounding, you skip the tax.
Reflections are a classic frame sink and one of the easiest places to save. Screen-space reflection quality can be dropped a level or two with almost no visible loss unless you're specifically staring at a wet floor or a puddle. I keep SSR on Medium in most games and never miss the difference.
A word on ray-traced reflections and global illumination: these are the genuinely transformative-but-brutal settings. They can be stunning and they can halve your frame rate. I treat them as an explicit choice, not a default. If your card has the headroom and an upscaler to lean on, enjoy them. If you're fighting for a stable 60, turn them off before you touch anything cosmetic.
Just as important as knowing what to cut is knowing what's nearly free. These are the ones I leave cranked because they cost little and matter a lot.
When I hand this process to a friend, I boil it down to a sequence they can run in ten minutes:
The reason this order works is that it front-loads the settings with the worst cost-to-looks ratio. By the time you've done the first five steps, you've usually recovered most of the frames you were missing without making the game look meaningfully worse.
Optimizing isn't about turning everything down, it's about knowing which sliders are quietly stealing your frames. Shadows, volumetrics, heavy anti-aliasing, and ray tracing are where the cost lives; textures, anisotropic filtering, and draw distance are where the beauty lives for cheap. Learn that split once and you'll never blindly slam a game to Low again. Spend twenty minutes with your frame counter open, test one setting at a time in a genuinely demanding scene, and you'll walk away with a game that looks great and runs the way you want it to.
Keep reading
Squeeze more frames from your current PC for free, driver tweaks, settings, and system fixes that boost in-game FPS without buying new hardware.
Frame generation can multiply FPS, but at a latency cost, learn how it works, when it helps, and when to leave it off for fast competitive play.